Copyright 2015: Dr. Jennifer Thomson
Non-commercial use encouraged with credit to author and source.
Reading from “The Death of the Hired
Man” by Robert Frost. The poem presents a conversation between a farm couple
about an old farm hand who shows up at the beginning of winter
“Silas is back.” . . .
. . . Be
kind," she said.
. . .
“When was I ever anything but kind to
him?
But I’ll not have the fellow
back," he said.
“I told him so last haying, didn’t
I?
‘If he left then,’ I said, ‘that
ended it.’
What good is he? Who else will
harbour him
At his age for the little he can
do?
What help he is there’s no depending
on.
Off he goes always when I need him
most.[”]
. . .
“Warren," she said, “he has come
home to die:
You needn’t be afraid he’ll leave you
this time.”
“Home," he mocked gently.
“Yes, what else but home?
It all depends on what you mean by
home.
Of course he’s nothing to us, any
more
Than was the hound that came a
stranger . . . .”
“Home is the place where, when you
have to go there,
They have to take you in.”
“I should have called it
Something you somehow haven’t to
deserve.”[i]
One morning when my daughter Rebecca
was about three and my daughter Ellen was about 18 months, I was frantically
trying to get us all ready to leave the house for daycare and work. As usual,
Rebecca had dressed herself and was sitting on the floor of her bedroom,
waiting for me to finish getting Ellen ready. Ellen was lying on her back on
Becca’s bed while I bent over her, trying to slip her shirt over her head. She
was flailing her arms and laughing as I grew more and more frustrated trying to
get her arms into her sleeves.
Imagine the scene: an 18-month-old
baby, so little lying there on the bed, laughs and wiggles as an increasingly
angry mom, so huge hovering above her, struggles to get her dressed. Finally, I
lost it. Completely. I grasped Ellen’s tiny toddler shoulders, leaned toward
her until our faced were close, and, “Rawrrrrr!”
Time stopped. Ellen stopped laughing and wiggling. I stopped roaring and shaking with anger. She looked at me, clearly startled and confused. I looked at her, thinking to myself, “What have I done to my baby?” and thinking that this was a parenting failure that could never be forgiven.
Then Ellen’s eyes crinkled and
laughter bubbled out of her. She pointed her little finger at me and said in
delight, “You Mama Monster!”
My anger melted
and I no longer felt frantic about getting ready for work. In her innocent
trust, Ellen turned my terrifying loss of control into a family concept—watch
out, kids, it’s a Mama Monster day today.
She let me off the hook when I didn’t
deserve it. That’s grace.
We regularly come
across various forms and meanings of “grace” in common secular usage: the grace
of a dancer; a grace period in student loan repayment; a gracious invitation;
saying grace before a meal. The connection between
- a dancer’s grace and
- grace as a religious concept
One way to think
of grace in Christianity is as the opposite of karma. Karma is the Hindu
concept that what we do in this life will be reflected in our next reincarnation—incentive
to treat others well. Grace, on the other hand, isn’t anything we deserve—it’s
a free gift no matter how much we mess up. Christian grace refers to the
undeserved gift of salvation God sent to the world in the form of Jesus Christ.
From the start, however, disagreements among Christians over
- how God confers grace,
- on whom,
- and what role (if any) human behavior plays in God’s conferral of grace
have precipitated the breaking up of Christianity into the
many forms and factions we take for granted. For example, Lutheran and other
Protestant denominations disagree with each other as well as with the Roman
Catholic Church about the exact workings of God’s grace.
The relatively young North American upstart
religion of Universalism ramped up the debate by declaring that God’s gift of
grace applied to everyone. It was this central tenet—called “universal
salvation”—that inspired the name Universalist.
The idea of grace as an undeserved
gift from God does have uniquely
Christian origins, though various religious concepts of grace appear in Jewish,
Hindu, and Islamic texts and practice as well. Grace and karma even act
together in some Hindu writings: the goal of Hinduism is to end the karma-cycle
of reincarnation through realization of one’s spiritual nature. Grace is often
identified as the means of spiritual realization and freedom from karma-driven
reincarnation.[ii]
In Islamic tradition, Muhammad
reportedly said, "None amongst you can get into Paradise by virtue of his
deeds alone ... not even I, but that Allah should wrap me in his grace and
mercy."[iii]
Unlike Hinduism, which implies that grace arises from an inner divinity, Islam
attributes grace to Allah’s action—though a person’s “deeds” are mentioned as a
necessary prerequisite for the conferral of grace that leads one to Paradise.
Given that Judaism, Christianity, and
Islam all arose out of the same tradition, it makes sense that these three
religions share a concern for the relationship between human actions and God’s
grace. One major disagreement in Christianity concerns whether living a good
life (or doing good works) is required for salvation or simply God’s unconditional
grace.
The nuances and labyrinthine arguments about grace and works interest me as a scholar, but not as a spiritual seeker. The heart of religion for me is all about a life worth living. I want my religion to suggest paths that may lead me to my best self and encourage me to keep going when the journey gets rough. A history of how the word “grace” acquired its many meanings resonates with my Unitarian Universalism and illuminates the role of grace in living my values.
Some of the linguistic twisting—try
to say that three times fast—of words for grace occurred as Jewish and early
Christian writings were translated from Hebrew to Greek to Latin and eventually
into various versions of English. For example, here’s one Jewish writer’s
explanation of the many translations of one Hebrew word:
"Well-known to Christians, the term
[“grace”] is generally familiar to Jewish audiences only in the expression
grace after meals (birkat
hamazon). It doesn’t
appear in Jewish vocabulary lists, on informational websites, or throughout
indices of hundreds of Jewish print resources on basic Judaism, God,
spirituality, Bible, theology, or values. And yet, it frequently appears in
English translations of the biblical text, triggering student queries.
"However, chen appears an additional 31 times in the text where it is
translated as favor or occasionally as gracious, precious, or pleasant.
"There seems to be no consistency
among either the Christian or Jewish translations." [iv]
Biblical scholars
note that the original meaning of the Hebrew word meant something like “favor”
or “to look down on with favor,” as a judge might look down at a defendant in
court.[v]
So the first confusion happens when
one Hebrew word appears in English translations mostly as the word “grace,” but
almost as often as one of these words: “favor, gracious, precious, or
pleasant.”
A second confusion involves the Greek
version of the Christian Bible. There, “‘Grace’ is the [most common] English
translation of the Greek χάρις (charis) meaning ‘that which brings
delight, joy, happiness, or good fortune.’[12]”[vi]
But the Greek word could mean “to rejoice,” a pleasant external appearance,
“loveliness,” “agreeableness,” “acceptableness,” and most often meant favor or
good-will, which leads to the meaning of gratitude or thankfulness (for the
favor or good-will).[vii]
As a side note, the Greek word charis
is the root of “charisma” and “charismatic.”
We haven’t even gotten to the Latin confusion.
http://gtu.edu/library/information/special-collections |
The history of the word grace and its many related meanings enriches my appreciation for the role grace plays in my life. Even the intricacies of theological disagreements about grace illuminate what grace can mean for us. As other Christian theologians focused on specific conditions required for grace, Universalists stepped back from the trees to look at the forest—and concluded that grace is unconditional. As 19th Century Universalist minister Thomas Starr King reportedly said, “’Universalists believe that God is too good to damn people, and the Unitarians believe that people are too good to be damned by God.’”[viii]
As Universalism
evolved, God’s universal love inspired core values of the faith. For
example, the 4th Principle of UUism encourages us as a community to
support each other in our individual search for truth and meaning—that’s an
acknowledgement of universal religious values. The 1st UU Principle
challenges us to acknowledge and even promote the inherent worth and dignity of
every person.
Grace as
reflected in the 1st Principle reveals itself in Unitarian
Universalist work for diversity, inclusion, and social justice. UU Historian
Mark Harris notes:
From its beginnings, Universalism
challenged its members to reach out and embrace people whom society often
marginalized. The Gloucester church included a freed slave among its charter
members, and the Universalists became the first denomination to ordain women to
the ministry, beginning in 1863 with Olympia Brown.[ix]
http://www.ucsummit.org/wordpress/visitors/uu-history/olympia-brown/#.VhxSX_lViko |
More recently, Unitarian Universalism was the first major
denomination to ordain openly gay and lesbian ministers and currently leads the
way on immigration reform and Black Lives Matter. That’s not to say we don’t
struggle with race, class, gender, ability, and all sorts of social justice
needs, a struggle that our faith challenges us to engage as a community and in
our individual lives.
The challenge
escalates as we approach the particulars of our individual lives. It takes
grace to acknowledge human dignity in the face of human flaws and brokenness.
When we encounter rudeness, greed, hatred, even violence in others, our
religion encourages us to react with grace. That means we must see the humanity
of the person. We do not have to like the person. We certainly do not condone
harmful behavior. But we do have the human obligation to honor the inherent
worth of each person no matter what.
Consider what that requires us to do.
Our UU values urge us to join national and international justice work for the
inherent dignity of every person. Many of you regularly work for social justice
through rallies, political action, donations of time and money. Your grace in
this work touches more lives than you will ever know.
At home, in our communities and in
our personal lives, the challenge to act from a place of unconditional love
tests us continuously. The village of East Troy continues to notify me that
unspecified neighbors have complained about my yard. I question the value of
their judgments and do not feel kindly disposed toward them. Grace and the 1st
Principle, however, urge me to approach them with loving kindness, no matter
how many times the village threatens to send someone to demolish my garden and
charge me $200 for that service. [Mama Monster Rawrrr.]
Clearly, for me, the practice of grace is a work in progress—as it is for all of us except perhaps the bodhisattvas in our midst. One reason we gather here together is for encouragement to keep up the struggle. Living your values is darn difficult. We’re here at United UU Congregation to support each other’s daily hard work toward creation of universally inclusive Beloved Community.
In our sacred work of building
Beloved Community, there will always be people who betray trust and respond to
love with fear or hatred. Grace as a sacred practice transforms our response to
others and our approach to life. Grace creates a better, more loving world. We
can start simply: next time someone greets you with anger or hatred, extend the
benefit of the doubt, as my 18-month-old daughter did for me.
[iv] http://jewishobserver.jewishdayton.org/2015/05/amazing-but-divergent-concepts-of-grace/;
The Dayton Jewish Observer; AMAZING BUT DIVERGENT CONCEPTS OF GRACE; MAY 22,
2015; Candace R. Kwiatek
[vii] http://www.bible-researcher.com/grace.html; Louis Berkhof, Systematic Theology (Grand
Rapids, 1949), pp. 426-27.
[viii]
UNITARIAN UNIVERSALIST ORIGINS: OUR HISTORIC FAITH: A pamphlet by Mark W.
Harris. http://www.uua.org/beliefs/history/our-historic-faith
Comments